This is the set of notes I wrote up for the talk I gave at the student analysis seminar on December 1 and December 8.

* * * * *

Let T:X \to Y be an operator between vector spaces satisfying some linearity condition. We fix Banach subspaces A_0 and A_1 fo X and B_0 and B_1 of Y. If the restrictions T|_{A_0} and T|_{A_1} are operators into B_0 and B_1, respectively, satisfying some norm estimates, then an interpolation theorem tells us that we can often find “intermediate” Banach spaces (A_t,B_t) between (A_0,B_0) and (A_1,B_1) such that T|_{A_t}, for each t \in [0,1], is a bounded operator into B_t with its norm depending canonically on the norm estimates at the endpoints.

Contents

Continue reading »

 

This is the set of notes I wrote up for the talk I gave at the student analysis seminar on September 14.

* * * * *

Recall that we adopt the notation of Agnew and Morse [AM38] and write [\mathscr{L},\rho,f,X] to denote the following:

  1. X is a real vector space;
  2. \rho is a sublinear functional on X;
  3. f is a linear functional defined on a subspace Y of X;
  4. f is dominated by \rho, viz., f(x) \leq \rho(x) for all x \in Y;
  5. \Lambda is a collection of endomorphisms on X;
  6. \rho is invariant under each \Lambda, viz., \rho ( \Lambda x ) = \rho(x) for each \Lambda \in \mathscr{L};
  7. f is invariant under each \Lambda, viz., f(\Lambda x) = f(x) for each \Lambda \in \mathscr{L};
  8. Y is invariant under each \Lambda, viz., \Lambda(Y) \subseteq Y for each \Lambda \in \mathscr{L}.

Furthermore, if [\mathscr{L},\rho,f,X] is satisfied, we write \{\mathscr{L},\rho,f,X\} to denote the collection of extensions F of f on X such that F is still dominated by \rho, and that

F ( \Lambda x ) = F(x)

for all \Lambda \in \mathscr{L}. In this notation, the classical Hahn-Banach theorem can be phrased as follows:

Theorem 1 (Hahn-Banach). Let X be a real vector space, and \mathscr{L}=\{I\}, where I:X \to X is the identity mapping. If [\mathscr{L},\rho,f,X], then \{\mathscr{L},\rho,f,X\} is nonempty.

Recall that a semigroup is a set with an associative binary operation. In the last talk, we have proved the following symmetry-invariant extension of Hahn-Banach:

Theorem 2 (Agnew-Morse). Let \mathscr{L} be a semigroup of commuting endomorphisms on a real vector space X. If [\mathscr{L},\rho,f,X], then \{\mathscr{L},\rho,f,X] is nonempty.

For a proof, see pages 25-27 of Lax [Lax02].

We also recall the key example from the last talk. We write X^* to denote the space of all real-valued sequences, and X_b to denote the space l^\infty(\mathbb{R}) of all bounded real-valued sequences. The classical Banach limit extend the usual limit in the following manner:

Theorem 3. There exists an operator L:X_b \to X_b, called a generalized limit or a Banach limit, such that

  1. The generalized limit agrees with the usual limit if the usual limit exists;
  2. L ((x_n)_{n=1}^\infty + (y_n)_{n=1}^\infty)  = L( (x_n)_{n=1}^\infty ) + L( (y_n)_{n=1}^\infty );
  3. L( (x_n)_{n=1}^\infty ) = L( (x_n)_{n=k}^\infty) for any k \in \mathbb{N};
  4. \displaystyle \liminf_{n \to \infty} x_n \leq L( (x_n)_{n=1}^\infty ) \leq \limsup_{n \to \infty} x_n.

We now see that the above theorem is an easy consequence of the Agnew-Morse theorem. Indeed, the Agnew-Morse theorem furnishes an extension of the regular limit operator that is invariant under the translation operator. A slight modification of the Agnew-Morse theorem allows us to extend the limit operator even further. Continue reading »

 

This is the set of notes I wrote up for the talk I gave at the student analysis seminar on September 13.

* * * * *

Definition 1. Let X be a real vector space. A sublinear functional on X is a real-valued function \rho on X satisfying

  1. Positive homogeneity. \rho(a x) = a \rho(x) for all a > 0 and x \in X;
  2. Subadditivity. \rho(x+y) \leq \rho(x)+\rho(y) for all x,y \in X.

A linear functional is a sublinear functional that is additive, viz.,

\rho(x+y) = \rho(x)+\rho(y)

for all x,y \in X.

Theorem 2 (Hahn, 1927; Banach, 1932). If a linear functional f on a subspace Y of a real vector space X is
dominated by a sublinear functional on X, then there exists an extension of f on X still dominated by the same sublinear functional.

Proof. Extend the linear functional by one dimension and use transfinite induction.

We now discuss a well-known application of the Hahn-Banach theorem, known as Banach limits, which extends the notion of limit to a more general class of sequences.

Definition 3. X_b = l^\infty(\mathbb{R}) is the normed linear space of all bounded real-valued sequences with the norm

\|(x_n)_{n=1}^\infty\| = \sup_{n \in \mathbb{N}} |x_n|.

Of course, not every bounded sequence converges. The classical Banach limit extends the notion of limit as follows:

Theorem 4. There exists an operator L:X_b \to X_b, called a generalized limit or a Banach limit, such that

  1. The generalized limit agrees with the usual limit if the usual limit exists;
  2. L ((x_n)_{n=1}^\infty + (y_n)_{n=1}^\infty)  = L( (x_n)_{n=1}^\infty ) + L( (y_n)_{n=1}^\infty );
  3. L( (x_n)_{n=1}^\infty ) = L( (x_n)_{n=k}^\infty) for any k \in \mathbb{N};
  4. \displaystyle \liminf_{n \to \infty} x_n \leq L( (x_n)_{n=1}^\infty ) \leq \limsup_{n \to \infty} x_n.

Proof. We define p:X_b \to \mathbb{R} by setting

\displaystyle p((x_n)_{n=1}^\infty) = \limsup_{n \to \infty} x_n

This is a sublinear functional on X_b. If S is the left-translation map

S((x_n)_{n=1}^\infty) = (x_n)_{n=2}^\infty,

then p(Sx)=p(x) for all x \in X_b. Let X_c be the space of convergent real-valued sequences, which is a linear subspace of X_b. We define a linear functional l:Y \to \mathbb{R} by

\displaystyle l((y_n)_{n=1}^\infty) = \lim_{n \to \infty} y_n.

Then l(y)=p(y) for all y \in X_c, and l(Sy)=l(y) for all y \in X_c. We invoke the Hahn-Banach theorem to furnish an extension L:X_b \to \mathbb{R} of l such that L is dominated by p and that L is invariant under left translation. In particular,

\displaystyle \liminf_{n \to \infty} x_n \leq L((x_n)_{n=1}^\infty) \leq \limsup_{n \to \infty} x_n,

for each x \in X_b satisfies the inequality -p(-x) \leq L(x) \leq p(x). It thus follows that L is the desired map. \square

Note that one of the key properties of the limit operator was “invariance under the translation operator,” viz.,

L((x_n)_{n=k}^\infty) = L((x_n)_{n=1}^\infty).

Keeping this in mind, we introduce a new notation, which will bring out the key elements of the Hahn-Banach theorem. The following is a slightly modified version of the notation employed in Agnew and Morse [AM38].

We shall write [\mathfrak{L},\rho,f,X] to denote the following:

  1. X is a real vector space;
  2. \rho is a sublinear functional on X;
  3. f is a linear functional defined on a subspace Y of X;
  4. f is dominated by \rho, viz., f(x) \leq \rho(x) for all x \in Y;
  5. \Lambda is a collection of endomorphisms on X;
  6. \rho is invariant under each \Lambda, viz., \rho(\Lambda x) =\rho(x) for each \Lambda \in \mathfrak{L}.
  7. f is invariant under each \Lambda, viz., f(\Lambda x) = f(x) for each \Lambda \in \mathfrak{L};
  8. Y is invariant under each \Lambda, viz., \Lambda(Y) \subseteq Y for each \Lambda \in \mathfrak{L}.

If [\mathfrak{L},\rho,f,X], then we write \{\mathfrak{L},\rho,f,X\} to denote the set of extensions F of f on X such that F is still dominated by \rho, and that

F(\Lambda x) = F(x)

for all \Lambda \in \mathfrak{L}. With the new shorthand, we can rephrase the classical Hahn-Banach theorem as follows:

Theorem 5 (Hahn-Banach, as stated in [AM38]).  Let X be a real vector space, and \mathfrak{L}=\{I\}, where I:X \to X is the identity mapping. If [\mathfrak{L},\rho,f,X], then \{\mathfrak{L},\rho,f,X\} is nonempty.

The main theorem of the talk is the symmetry-invariant version of the Hahn-Banach theorem known as the Agnew-Morse theorem. The theorem was first proven by A. G. Agnew and A. P. Morse in 1938 [AM38], and was subsequently generalized by E. J. McShane, R. B. Warfield, and V. M. Warfield in 1969 [MWW69]. We state here the minor generalization of the McShane-Warfield-Warfield formulation of the theorem, as stated in [Lax02]:

Theorem 6 (Agnew-Morse, 1937; McShane-Warfield-Warfield, 1969; Lax, 2002). Let X be a real vector space, and \mathfrak{L} be a collection of endomorphisms on X that commute, viz.,

\Lambda_t \Lambda_s = \Lambda_s \Lambda_t

for any pair of operators \Lambda_t and \Lambda_s in \mathfrak{L}. If [\mathfrak{L},\rho,f,X], then \{\mathfrak{L},\rho,f,X\} is nonempty.

Continue reading »

© 2011 Mark Hyun-ki Kim Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha